Desert News – Losing
Innocence: the Cost of Sexualizing Teens
Desert News – Losing
Innocence: the Cost of Sexualizing Teens
This cover story was fascinating to me. I loved the way it
opened by highlighting the things that have become acceptable to us, even just
walking through a mall. It was so great have all these subliminal messages
called again to my attention. The wonderful statistics that quantify so many
trends that are oft discussed but rarely qualified – such as the shocking fact
that 47% of underage media characters are shown participating in sexual
situations and 98% of these occurred outside of any form of committed
relationship; not to mention that thongs and pushup bras are now being made for
children as young as 6. This feature story raised three main areas of thought
for me.
1)
Power
balance between consumers and corporations. This supposed battle is often
cast with the ‘big, bad corporation’ (Occupy Wall Street?) as the overwhelming
antagonist. As this article explicitly addresses, there is truth in the concept
that these large businesses, or any business for that matter, operate and make
decisions based on profit. However, what
we often do not acknowledge is the power we as consumers have over these large
corporations. As a consumer, our buying choices are the source of these
businesses profit, meaning that they will only produce what we will buy. Just
as China needs the United States to buy their goods, these companies
need consumers to buy their goods, whether their goods are items in a store
(such as the sexualized toys addressed in this story) or a TV show, or a
magazine. This article quotes an anonymous employee for a popular toy
manufacturer who when asked if a particular toy is too sexy for young girls
stated says “the sales speak for themselves…. [the large profits are] proof
that good parents are buying them”. This makes me think that at least part of
the problem of sexualized children and teens is that we as consumers are
consuming, whether passively or actively, the sources of the problem.
2) Subliminal Messages and the Deceptive Art
of Moral Decay. How are subjects and items that were distasteful 10 years
ago, shocking 20 years ago, and completely unheard of in common society 40 years
ago now acceptable today? This social and cultural phenonemum has more power
than we perhaps realize, as it is now affecting physical aspects of human
development. This article talks about how both girls and boys are experiencing
puberty much younger than 10 years ago. Did you know that 15% of girls start
puberty at age 7 and 27% begin at age 8? According to this estimate, 42% of
girls have begun puberty before their ninth birthday. Whilst these trends
are rapid, what must be noted is that these changes in what is morally
acceptable to society do not happen instantly. We are slowly and surely led
down the hill of moral decline, by eroding at standards little by little. A
scene in a television show will slowly, but surely, push more and more
boundaries, until it reaches an irrevocably scandalous level, at which point we
ask, how did we get here? We are prey to so many subliminal messages
constantly, from the products sold in stores, to the graphics on peoples’
t-shirts, to the often unflagged (75% of shows with sexual content did not
mention it in its rating) sexual content in TV shows. Like a brownie with a
little bit of dog poo, we are accustoming ourselves to the taste of trash
little by little. The only way to halt the art of moral decay is to start being
shocked! Instead of accepting another little decline in what is acceptable, we
must stand up and say it is not
acceptable. We must exercise our power as consumers, and stop consuming trash.
Just as potty humour is the lowest form, sexualized products, be they toys or
media, are the lowest forms of their respective genres. This is not always
easy. Part of what makes moral decline an art, is its subtly. Whilst we may
choose to not watch a movie that is all about sex, we may excuse one
questionable scene. A magazine may have a few dodgy pictures, and some more
acceptable ones too. This is where we really must take a stand. It makes no
difference to a corporation if you only consume a partial product. To change
these trends we must say no to it all.
We wouldn’t accept an item of clothing that
came with a tear, or a new car with a faulty transmission. So why do we accept ‘faulty’
media, with rips and tears and large stains in its moral fiber?
We
can and should use channels for feedback to explain to corporations why we
don’t want to consume ‘faulty’ products. Obviously, this is a big fight, and we
may be the minority in the crowd that feels this way. But I believe it is my
responsibility to only endorse and spend
my money and time on products that
reflect my values.
Just as what you eat will reflect in what
your body looks like, I believe that what media and products we consume will
reflect in our morals, our self esteem, and our ability to live our lives as
examples of the Saviour (or whichever moral code or religion you hold).
By standing up against sexualized content,
I believe we will challenge corporations out of lazy habits and potentially
even force them to be truly creative once more.
3) Ethical PR. As a student of PR, and a
child of entrepreneurs, I have often pondered the ethics of sales. When you
work to sell something, you become an advocate for it; something that comes
much more easily when you truly believe in it. I never want to sell something
that contradicts with my own values. I admire my dad for turning down large
contracts for liquor companies that contradicted his own beliefs. In terms of
the pollution of society’s morals (not just our western society, but what I see
as the tragic pollution of other cultures and societies, often led by popular
Western media) I want to always be an advocate for The Honest Art of Moral Incline.
"accepting faulty media" Great way to put it Sophie.
ReplyDelete